In general I think novelists should not speak about politics, and if they speak about them we should resist listening. These are people accustomed to creating imaginary worlds and making them go as they like, which can make their opinions tend to the fascistic, even their gentle-hippie or wise-crone opinions. Autocratic maybe rather than fascistic. The relation of cause to effect in fiction, remember, is the reverse of the same relation in life, at least from the novelist’s point of view: endings and conclusions cause the situations that will bring them about, and characters take paths or do deeds because the endings say they must; all writers know they can always change a character’s early life if they find that they need a cause for something in his later life. Doing this every day does not make for a good political sense, which requires a mature and wise sense of actual possibilities.
This explains a lot, actually
1 - Tablets can be read in the windiest of conditions. Try that with paper! 2 - Even in still conditions, I prefer the heft of a solid object to a…
Get your Al Jazeera English live stream here
Sean Tevis's 2008 xkcd-style campaign ad for Kansas State Representative He lost. But he's running again.